Blog Layout

Charleston and Coffee – Yesterday and Today: Country Club Golf comes to America by way of a Coffee House

Paul Attaway • Feb 11, 2022

September 29 is a special day for me. First, it’s my wife’s birthday and it’s also the day, in 1786, when our country’s first ever golf club convened, and they did so at a coffee house. To learn more, read on.

 

We are a social people, designed by our Creator for community. To draw two or more people together, all we need is a common interest and a place to meet. In our day and age, the internet has helped people find others who share common interests and passions. But the internet, despite the advent of Zoom and other similar platforms, cannot and will never replace the power and intimacy of meeting together. When we come together, our energies are not added to those of others in the room, they are multiplied.


Times were no different in Charleston in the late 18th century. During the American Revolution, the City of Charleston was divided by how one’s allegiances fell – in line with the idea of a free and independent nation or in line with loyalty to the British Crown. The first group were known as the Patriots and the second group, the Loyalists. The war’s ending did not end these divisions and in some parts of the country, Patriots seized Loyalists’ private property, and many Loyalists were run out of town or left of their own volition.


Attitudes in Charleston were no different. The City was splintered, but as it began to put itself together it did so through the formation of societies organized around one’s nationality, political leanings, and preferred pastimes. At first, what connected people was likely in part, continued hostility towards another group but what kept the groups moving forward was a shared passion.


Therefore, what began on hostile, negative footing, evolved into a positive celebration of shared interests.


For instance, the planter class which lived on the plantations outside Charleston but maintained homes in Charleston was closely associated with the Patriots and eschewed the merchant class that lived in Charleston and were more likely to be associated with the Loyalists. But the planter class also loved their hunting and horseracing and were so motivated to start societies organized around these activities such as the Jockey Club and the Agricultural Society.


For the Scottish merchants living in Charleston, what held them together as their animosity towards the Patriots waned was their passion for the game they brought with them from the eastern shores of Scotland – golf.


Golf was not invented, rather the game evolved. Variations of the basic game – striking a ball with a stick or club and advancing the ball from here to there in as few strokes as possible – can be found in the recorded histories of any number of cultures and tribes including the Romans, Greeks, the Dutch, etc… It’s not known exactly when the game appeared in Scotland or from where it came but many believe the game migrated to the eastern shores of Scotland from what we now know as the Netherlands. 


By the early 18th Century, the British Isles were trading regularly with their colonies in the new world. The city of Charles Town, as it was known until 1783, was a bustling cultural and economic hub. Ships carrying rice, cotton and Indigo left Charles Town for ports in the Bahamas as well as England and Scotland and returned with finished products prized by the City’s wealthiest, many who had come to America from Scotland and England.


It’s no surprise then, that the merchants of the day brought their favorite past times with them. For this, we are eternally grateful and can thus mark May 10, 1743 as the day golf arrived in America when a shipment of 432 golf balls (featheries) and 96 clubs arrived in Charles Town for David Deas, a Scottish merchant from Edinburgh, Scotland who owned a store along a strip on East Bay Street known today as Rainbow Row. This shipment is the first known shipment of golf equipment to the new world.


The shipment left for Charles Town from the docks district of Edinburgh, Scotland known as Leith. A year later (1744), the Honorable Company of Edinburgh Golfers was formed, and a five-hole golf course was laid out on the Leith Links, the land along the coast north of Edinburgh. The foundation for the rules of golf, later adopted by the Royal and Ancient Company of Golfers in St. Andrews, Scotland were first developed by the Honorable Company of Edinburgh Golfers.


It’s reasonable to conclude that David Deas had played golf at the Leith Links. It is also easy to conclude that his shipment of 96 clubs and 432 featheries were destined for a company of golfers in Charles Town and not solely for his own use since at the time a set of clubs consisted of five to eight individual clubs meaning 96 clubs was enough for 12 to 19 players.


In Charleston, golf was first played on Harleston Green, a rectangular patch of land between Calhoun and Beaufain and Rutledge and Barre St. All the golfers needed now was a club house, a place to congregate and call home, a place and settle their bets. That place was John William’s Coffee House, on the corner of Tradd Street and Bay Street. 


The Carolina Coffee House on Birchin Lane in the City of London served not only as a place to learn about travelling to or investing in the Carolinas, but it also served as a meeting place for merchants from the Carolinas visiting England. Similarly, Scotsmen visiting Charleston would congregate at the John Williams Coffee house to catch up on news, exchange ideas, and swap stories. Beginning in 1787, the St. Andrews Society of Charleston, formed in 1729 and the oldest society in the world celebrating Scottish culture, began meeting at the Williams Coffee House.  It was only natural then that when the Scottish golfers banging featheries around Harleston Green needed a ‘club house’ that they would pick the Williams coffee house.


            Something tells me that a few pints were poured at this coffee house as well.


By Paul Attaway 28 Jul, 2022
We all know what fiction is and we have a general understanding of what historical fiction is – narratives that take place in the past and involve an imaginative reconstruction of events and/or characters, real or imagined. But what do we call a story set in the not-so-distant past? Before considering a definition, let’s look more closely at historical fiction.
By Paul Attaway 28 Jul, 2022
A Lesson From Lewis Carroll: RESEARCH IS THE ESSENTIAL RABBIT HOLE FOR ANY WRITER
By Paul Attaway 16 Jun, 2022
This week the U.S. Open returns to The Country Club in Baseline, Massachusetts, and it seems fitting as recent events in the world of professional golf have highlighted what it means to be a professional golfer and launched conversations as to why we love and play the game. It seems fitting because in 1913, twenty-year old amateur Francis Ouimet [1] , shocked the world beating the best in the game at The Country Club to become the first amateur and only the second American to win the US Open, a tournament that had been played since 1895, and in the process wrote chapter one of the story in this country of what it means to be a professional athlete. Last week, the upstart tour, LIV, hosted its first tournament. The tour is underwritten by the Saudi Sovereign Wealth Fund which means the players are being paid by Mohammed bin Salman Al Saud, MBS to his friends, the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia. This blog post is not about the propriety of accepting pay from the ruler of an authoritarian nation, not that the questions surrounding the payor and his motives aren’t important or worthy of discussion, but because that’s not what I want to write about today. No, today, I’ve been thinking about the essence of competition, what we love about it and how it plays out in the game of golf specifically. The Spirit of Competition From the game’s inception, money has been wagered on the outcome and the primary form of competition is what we call match play. The winner is the player who wins the most holes regardless of the total score at the end of the round. In match play there’s only one winner. Match play is still the most popular form of competition. At public and private courses around the country today amateurs playing weekend golf are likely to wager with friends using a match play format. Even today, a Scottish town may have one public golf course, but it could have had multiple private golf clubs all sharing the same course, and from the earliest days, these clubs would host tournaments, each club putting up their best players against the other clubs’ best. Further, it was not uncommon for the members of a club to send their best to a neighboring town to play a match or series of matches against a team sponsored by another club. The winner might receive a jacket, a cup, trophy, or medal of some sort. In some cases, a small cash prize would be paid, the money for which had been collected from the club’s membership. Membership in these clubs was typically reserved for the wealthiest, people who could spend the time required to master the game. Often, the club would send their head pro to compete for the club. In those cases, the membership would cover the player’s travel expenses. The point being, though, there was only winner; no second place. The Spirit of the Game and the Professional Golfer In the late 1800s and early 1900s, many of the world’s top golfers were amateurs and the professional golfer was the club pro who made his living as the head professional at a private club. His duties would have included making clubs and giving lessons. When Francis Ouimet won the US Open in 1913, nearly every golf professional was an employee of a private club and frankly they were looked down on as second-class citizens. As the game of golf exploded in this country following Francis Ouimet’s victory and the prospects of someone making a living playing tournament materialized, much was written about the beauty and purity of the amateur playing for the love of the game as contrasted with the professional who plays for money. Buried in these words is a fair amount of class-based elitism. Amateurs competing on the world stage at the time were wealthy men who could afford to join private clubs and take hours off to play the game each week. Simply stated, they looked down on working-class people and that’s what a professional was, working class. That’s all the more reason why Francis Ouimet’s victory was so shocking; he was an amateur for sure, but he was poor and from a working-class family. He was not your traditional, wealthy amateur. The arrogance of the guardians of the game was on full display when in 1916 the USGA stripped Francis Ouimet of his amateur status because they concluded he was profiting off his fame by using it to promote the success of his sporting goods store. A few years later, in response to an outpouring of support for Ouimet, the USGA quietly reversed its decision. (Francis Ouimet continued to compete as an Amateur and won the US Amateur Championship in 1931.) While elitism still exists today throughout our culture, in the game of golf, the professional reigns supreme. The attitude towards the professional golfer began to change in the 1930s and 1940s and the great amateur Bobby Jones was instrumental in that change. Around this time, a yearlong tournament schedule was developed, and it became possible for a player to make a living travelling the country playing tournament golf. Match play gave way to stroke play as the dominant form of competition as TV became a larger presence and it was deemed that stroke play was an easier format around which to develop a television audience. For the tour to survive, however, players must have a realistic chance of making enough money even if they don’t win. So, today, a purse is divided up amongst the top finishers at a tournament. But still, the better you play, the more you make. So, while you no longer need to place first to win money, the spirit of the competition was still there. Furthermore, there was no guaranteed money. Often, you had to qualify on a Monday to play in the tournament and then if you did, you had to make the cut after the first two days if you were to make any money. Yes, the spirit of competition survived. Now don’t get me wrong. I know how much money the top players make today; they’re not struggling to survive, but they had to work hard, and they earned their money by winning regularly. Nevertheless, the tour can be grueling because if you don’t make the cut after the Thursday and Friday rounds, you don’t get paid and then you move on to the next tournament, often the very next week. The PGA Tour does provide a pension for its members. However, your payout is a function of what you put in: the number of tournaments you play, the number of cuts you make, the number of Wednesday Pro-Ams you play, and how well you do in the tournaments, for instance. In other words, the better you perform, the more you make. I haven’t even touched on what it takes to become a PGA Tour Member. The competition is intense. Playing for more than just money But the PGA Tour and European Tour player is also playing for more than just money. They are playing for their place in history. Great tradition surrounds many of the stops on these tours. And then there are the Majors: The Open, The US Open, the PGA Championship and The Masters. Finally, two of the most pressure packed events are the Ryder Cup and the Presidents Cup, biannual tournaments played between the best players from the United States against the best European players and the best players from the rest of the world, respectively. There are no cash prizes at these two events. Just pride, national pride. Although golf is a solitary game – you against the course or you against another player or the field – and it might appear as if you are only playing for yourself, I don’t think that’s the case. From the earliest days, golfers played for their town or their club. Today, weekend golfers put together bets by which your foursome is playing another foursome. Professional golfers today compete for their country in the Olympics, the Ryder Cup and the Presidents Cup. Even PGA Members who when tournaments seemingly for themselves are elevating the stature of the PGA Tour which benefits not just themselves but their fellow Tour members. The LIV Tour So, what to make of the LIV Tour? Last weekend, the LIV hosted its first tournament and the field of 48 players included a few big names such as Dustin Johnson and a host of names that only the most ardent golf fan would have recognized. The players were paid to join the tour and last place at the event earned $120,000. At the Canadian Open being played at the same time, five players tied for 48 th place and each one took home $22,567. If you missed the cut that week then you made nothing. The Canadian Open has been played since 1904 and former winners include: Walter Hagen, Sam Snead, Byron Nelson, Arnold Palmer, Lee Trevino, Nick price, Jim Furyk, and Tiger Woods. Jack Nicklaus has seven runner-up finishes at The Canadian Open. On the LIV Tour, you get paid to show up, win or lose. Who cares? I guess we’re supposed to be impressed by the great play. I love golf but am the first to admit that I rarely watch it on TV beyond the majors, which, by the way, are acknowledged as minor national holidays in our household. I watch the majors because of the tradition, the history, and the stakes other than the money. Yes, I watch because they are the best players in the world but also because they are putting themselves out there. They eat what they kill. And simply stated, some tournaments just mean more than others. The competition on the PGA Tour and the European Tour is real. The nerves are real. Especially at the Ryder Cup and Presidents Cup. How can I get excited about watching folks play golf when they can finish dead last and still get paid and would have already been paid just for foregoing another tour? Independent Contractors, they say The players that have fled the PGA and European Tours for the safety of the LIV Tour make a lot of noise about being independent contractors and claim that means they should be able to do what they want. Yes, members of the PGA Tour are independent contractors and, yes, they are contractually obligated to enter a minimum number of tournaments each year, but I wonder if Dustin Johnson and Phil Mickelson are independent contractors anymore. We’ve read that Mickelson was paid $200 million to join LIV. Was he wired this money in one lump sum a few weeks ago or will it be paid out over time? I have a feeling it will be paid out over time and that he is obligated to play in the tournaments and promote the LIV Tour. Sounds to me more like he’s an employee of Mohammad bin Salman. The PGA has suspended Phil. I wonder what MBS will do if Phil decides to stop playing in his tournaments? For the love of the game In 1913, an amateur shocked the golf world. The romance of playing purely for the love of the game gave way to the reality that only a handful of people could spend their lives playing golf without a financial care in the world and room for the professional was accommodated. With the ascendency of the professional, an amateur hasn’t challenged the top players since the days of Bobby Jones but that’s okay. When I watch the world’s best golfers competing to win a trophy on a famous course that was previously won by Walter Hagen, Jack Nicklaus, or Ben Hogan for instance, I see players playing not just for the money but for the love of the game and for their place in history. I’m heading to the driving range now. I’m playing tomorrow, and in my foursome, we will throw balls up on the first tee to determine teams and then compete in a $20 Nassau. Second place gets nothing! [1] The story was immortalized by Mark Frost in his book, The Greatest Game Ever Played: Harry Vardon, Francis Ouimet, and the Birth of Modern Golf and popularized by the movie The Greatest Game Ever Played, based on the book.
Show More
Share by:
Book a Tour